Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Why alcohol is Biblically-acceptable at public, family events in Rogersville

[Note: the following is written in response to a series of posts on a message board upon which folks from my hometown post regularly about current events in our town.]

In several posts on this forum, folks have posted -- either explicitly or impliedly -- that drinking alcohol is wrong, and that Rogersville officials are evil for allowing alcohol at public events, such as the "Bluegrass and BBQ" event that was recently held on the Courthouse Square.

To me it's very sad that in my hometown, a place that has always seemed very Biblically literate (i.e., people know what the Bible actually says, not what they've been "taught" the Bible says), people are having this argument.

Here is why.

1. BIBLICAL AUTHORITY

Someone mentioned the "KJV," which I'm guessing is their citation of the King James Bible as the only "real" authoritative version of the Bible (which raises a whole host of other issues, such as: what Bible was the "real" version before 1611), so it seems to me that some Scriptural citations -- in the King James Version -- would be appropriate.

Ecclesiastes 9:7-8 says, "Go thy way, eat thy bread with joy, and drink thy wine with a merry heart; for God now accepteth thy works. Let thy garments be always white; and let thy head lack no ointment."

Psalm 104:14-15 says, "He," meaning God, "causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth; and wine that maketh glad the heart of man, and oil to make his face to shine, and bread which strengtheneth man's heart."

John 2:1-11 says, "And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, 'They have no wine.'

"Jesus saith unto her, 'Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.'

"His mother saith unto the servants, 'Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it.'

"And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece.

"Jesus saith unto them, 'Fill the waterpots with water.' And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, 'Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast.' And they bare it.

"When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, and saith unto him, 'Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now.'

"This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him."

* * *

2. WHAT DOES THE SCRIPTURE MEAN?

So clearly, there is a disconnect between what the people on this posting believe the Bible says and what the Bible actually says.

A. Ecclesiastes 9

First, with regard to the Ecclesiastes passage: the author of Ecclesiastes, inspired by the Holy Spirit, has been writing about the vanity of the world. But in his recognition that, outside God, everything is vanity, the author also realizes that God has provided for some happiness in this world. What are among those blessings? The simple ones: "bread of joy" and "wine with a merry heart."

This isn't the drink-wine-because-water's-not-safe (if that were the case, the "thou leadest me beside still waters" doesn't make a lot of sense over in Psalm 23) use of wine; no, here, the Holy Spirit, through the writer of Ecclesiastes, specifically instructs those who recognize that vanity of the world to drink their wine with a merry heart -- and seemingly precisely because it gives a merry heart.

B. Psalm 104

In Psalm 104, the Holy Spirit is even clearer than in the Ecclesiastes passage. Here, the author declares, "He causeth ... wine that maketh glad the heart of man." It's difficult to explain this away (though I'm sure some here will try, giving up a "literal" interpretation of Scripture because it doesn't fit their preconceptions).

What does God cause wine? To "maketh glad the heart of man." Period. Not for health purposes. Not because the water isn't safe. Not because they don't have Coca-Cola. Because it "maketh glad the heart of man." Clearly, then, if God's purpose in creating wine was to "maketh glad the heart of man," can it be against God's purpose for his creatures to use it for that very purpose?

I would argue no.

C. John: the Miracle of the Wedding at Cana

Finally, we come to Jesus. Even if the Old Testament allows a Godly person to drink wine, surely, in the New Testament, our Lord Jesus Christ condemns alcohol use, setting up rules for us to avoid it's "evil" "tempting" power.

In fact, Jesus does the opposite.

First, Jesus is at a wedding. He goes with his mom and his brothers and sisters. At the wedding, there is wine -- and lots of it. There are multiple "casks" (i.e., large barrels) of wine. Does Jesus condemn the wedding-goers? Does he give a parable, explaining to them the evils of alcohol? Does he explicitly say that he won't drink the wine? No. None of the above.

And then, the wedding hosts run out of wine. People have drank so much wine that there isn't any more wine. So Jesus' mom, Mary, comes to him and says, "Son, our hosts haven't planned well enough, and they've run out of wine."

Does Jesus respond to his mother with a rebuke? Does he say, "Well good, woman, because they're all drunk, and they don't need any more wine"? Does he give a parable, explaining why he cannot?

No: Jesus provides more wine. Miraculously. And it's his first miracle! Jesus' first miracle isn't a healing, it isn't raising from the dead, it isn't casting out demons -- instead, he wants people to have fun at a wedding party by giving them more wine!

* * *

3. WAS BEER AT THE DOWNTOWN EVENT OKAY?

People here have stated that the leaders of Rogersville must be reprobate because they had beer at a "family" event. In order to look down on these civic leaders, the people who believe that it was wrong for there to be beer in downtown must set themselves above our Lord Jesus Christ.

For them to hold that position, they have to argue that they're more righteous than Jesus -- that they have a clearer understanding of God's will than Jesus. Because when Jesus was confronted with a joyful, public occasion, involving the whole community (including children and families), not only did he fail to condemn the alcohol use, but instead, he furthered its consumption!

We do see, in the New Testament, examples of people who take God's Law seriously. They take it so seriously, in fact, that they come up with "extra" rules that go above and beyond what God requires. For example, they read in the Law that God requires us to "remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy." They want to obey God's law, but they're afraid that they might unintentionally break the law. So what do they do? They come up with extra requirements to help them avoid breaking the law. They come up with all sorts of things that "might" be considered work, and thus breaking the Sabbath. They don't want to break the Sabbath, so they say that these "extras" are also what God was talking about when he hallowed the Sabbath.

Sounds like a good idea, right? After all, we don't want to break God's law -- we want to be holy as He is holy -- we want to be obedient -- we want rules to follow.

But Jesus doesn't agree. Because these people that come up with extra ways, on top of God's law, for being holy? They're called Pharisees. And more than anyone else in the Bible, Jesus rebukes them, mocks them, ridicules them, and calls them names.

I know that the people on this forum who are against alcohol consumption have good intentions in their hearts. They know that alcohol can become addictive, and they know that the Bible does say that it is sinful to become drunk. And so, because they are afraid of that temptation to sin, they decide to come up with extra rules. Instead of what the Bible teaches -- alcohol in moderation is not only acceptable, but within God's very purpose in allowing wine in the first place, they decide that we cannot drink at all -- because the temptation is far too great that we might sin.

Ladies and gentlemen, that is the very definition of being a Pharisee: it is putting a human rule or tradition on top and in excess of what God has demanded and required in his law. Jesus calls that sort of activity a sin: pride. And he calls those who commit it to repent.

I am confident that our Lord Jesus, as he looked down upon the Courthouse Square in Rogersville during the Bluegrass event was enjoying the music -- gifts and talents his Father gave to those playing and singing it -- and also laughed along with all those who were partaking of a part of the bounty of his Father's creation -- beer, the fruit of fermented barley -- without excess.

And if Jesus had showed up outside the Hale Springs Inn to enjoy the show? There's a good chance he would have probably had a beer.

FEELING: Hopeful that people will listen to the Scriptures
LISTENING TO: What the Bible says

3 Comments:

At 12:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everything you said was true and I agree with your argument. Going to that event would be no different than going to Applebees where people are drinking. Maybe next time people should be made aware that Alcohol will be at an event like this. So if people who are offended by this because it was a family event can choose not to go...just as they could choose not to go to a restaurant that serves beer.

However, I believe God convicts the souls of men. He has convicted mine. I have many convictions if you will. As a Christian I do not listen to secular music. This is a conviction I feel God has bestowed on me. I am also convicted not to drink alcohol. Is it wrong to listen to rap, country or alternative music? No..Is it wrong to drink without excess? No. But for me, it would be.

Thanks for your biblical argument. I hope you appreciate my comment and see a different view point. I try to tell people to live by their "convictions." How do we do that? Read God's word. Pray and listen to what God has to say. And let Him convict your heart.

 
At 2:18 PM, Blogger Diezba said...

I certainly have no beef with individual persons who feel conviction about alcohol in their own life. Certainly, there are plenty of people for whom it would be against God's purpose for their life to drink.

My problem, and the problem I tried to address with this post, is that some of these people, who have convictions like yours, take their personal conviction -- which may or may not come from God -- and try to impose it upon others.

As I say in my post, they attempt to "add things" to God's law.

My problem with the folks on the Rogersville Forum is that they argued that not only should there not have been alcohol, but they presence of alcohol should have been posted so that they would have known not to go.

Why can they not be present around alcohol? We do not know for sure whether Jesus drank wine at the wedding in Cana. But we do know that on multiple occasions (in addition to the wedding, there was wine at the tax collector's party, among others), Jesus was present where alcohol was being consumed. He sat down and ate (and drank?) with sinners (just like me).

My problem with people that demand alcohol-free events is that their arguments for that, or for notice so that they won't attend, is based upon the same argument that the Pharisees used (the same argument that Jesus rebuked).

For me, it comes down to this: if Jesus wasn't "too good" to spend time with those drinking alcohol and enjoying themselves, why are the folks who protest alcohol in Rogersville "too good" or "too convicted" to be present, too?

 
At 8:59 AM, Blogger Patricia said...

Thank you for your cogently expressed and well-reasoned comment.

Patricia Humbert

 

Post a Comment

<< Home